home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1993
/
TIME Almanac 1993.iso
/
time
/
111191
/
1111102.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1992-08-28
|
3KB
|
61 lines
NATION, Page 40COVER STORIESNow We've Really Got Your Number
The new phone service known as Caller I.D. is a double-edged
sword: it protects the privacy of some people, but at the
expense of others. For about $6.50 a month, plus a one-time
equipment charge of $45 to $80, customers get an electronic
screen that displays the phone number of every incoming call.
First offered four years ago in New Jersey by New Jersey Bell,
Caller I.D. is now available in 20 states and under
consideration in 13 others.
Caller I.D. is being touted as a way to combat obscene and
annoying callers. It also gives florists, pizza shops and other
delivery businesses a way to check that incoming orders are not
pranks. Phone companies have been promoting the service as an
electronic version of the peephole that lets apartment dwellers
see who is knocking. "Caller I.D. protects subscriber privacy
because it lets subscribers decide who to let into their house,"
says A. Gray Collins, a Bell Atlantic executive vice president.
But it also diminishes the privacy of callers. Some
businesses use a commercial version of Caller I.D. that quietly
displays the phone number of people who inquire about products,
investments or insurance. The numbers can then be used to obtain
other information about individual customers from consumer data
bases. Privacy activists are also worried that the prospect of
having phone numbers revealed will discourage anonymous police
tipsters and callers to telephone hot lines that serve drug
abusers, runaways and other people in trouble. Says Janlori
Goldman of the A.C.L.U.: "The danger of Caller I.D. is that
people lose control over when and to whom to give their
telephone numbers."
Several states, including California, New York and
Pennsylvania, have taken steps to prohibit Caller I.D. unless
phone companies offer customers the ability to block their
numbers from being displayed at any time. To pre-empt further
moves by the states, the Federal Communications Commission has
proposed that callers be allowed to block the display of their
numbers on individual calls but not be able to demand that the
phone company automatically block their numbers from being
displayed at any time. The conflict may have to be resolved in
the courts or Congress. The Senate has before it a bill that
would permit the per-call restrictions proposed by the FCC. The
House is considering a version that would allow the broader
limits favored by some states. Telephone-company executives
expect the two measures to be reconciled by the end of the year.
By Richard Lacayo. Reported by Jerome Cramer/Washington.